ABG II Recall

Lawsuits Mounting for ABG II Recall Incident

abg II recall2012 was not a good year for people who have undergone artificial hip implant because of the ABG II Recall issue. Stryker Corporation, the company which manufactured the ABG II Modular Neck – Hip Stems, gave a safety warning to hospitals and surgeons regarding the potential risk of using their hip implant product to the patients. Currently, the company has ceased to produce the ABG II Modular Neck – Hip Stems. Since its recall, the lawsuits against the Stryker Corporation have been piling up. Another company, DePuy, is also being sued because most patients who received a hip implant using DePuy’s Pinnacle Hip Solution is now suffering from pain, swelling and negative complications.

Why are these Hip Implant Systems Being Recalled?

The ABG II hip implant system was recalled because Stryker Corporation found out that their product can undergo corrosion and fretting, which means that it can fatally harm the patient. The most serious complication can lead to metal poisoning and even tissue and bone death. There have been many patients who have undergone revision surgery because of this device flaw. Many also fear that because of the metal on metal hip replacement, their bloodstream or tissues are being filled with cobalt and chromium, which is a major component of the device. Hip swelling and pain are common among patients who have received the ABG II Hip Replacement System. This is clearly a medical device failure that was sadly overlooked by the Stryker Corporation.

Lawsuits Against Stryker Corporation

Now that almost everyone has heard of the ABG II Recall, hospitals and the FDA have been receiving a lot of complaints and reports about the adverse effects of the ABG II hip implant system. These people are very angry because instead of being able to walk normally again, they are now suffering from constant pain, fractures, bone and tissue loss. The patients accuse the company of being negligent and continuously selling a product which is not 100% safe to be used by patients. Others say that the company was seriously misleading about their Hip Replacement System. The common lawsuit being filed is the Personal Injury lawsuit where a patient can seek compensation for the expenses incurred for their revision surgery and treatment, wages lost and damages as well as for the suffering and traumatic pain.

Are You a Victim of this Health Care Incident?

If you are a victim of the ABG II Recall or other similar hip recall device cases, then you can also file a lawsuit against the company which manufactured the hip replacement device. It is your right to seek compensation because you’ve been promised to be given a hip replacement procedure that can get rid of all your problems. However, since you were given a device that can be a potential health hazard, you should file a complaint and lawsuit. Hip replacement surgery is very expensive and undergoing another revision surgery will not only drain you financially but physically and emotionally as well.

If you have undergone a hip replacement surgery, you should check your medical records and find out if the device used came from Stryker or DePuy. Sometimes, the device can be listed under a different product name so you have to look closely.

The ABG II Recall incident is a serious matter which should not be taken lightly. Health issues like these can be a hard blow to the medical community because people may begin to doubt and question the credibility of some hospitals, surgeons and medical devices.

Rejuvenate Recall

Complaints Resulting from Defective Hip Implant evoking Rejuvenate Recall

Medical implants are created to make patients lives easier. They serve to protect patients who are suffering from different medical aliments. Unfortunately, there are several implants that are defective and cause more harm to humans than good. In fact, there are hundreds of patients who have suffered additional injuries because of malfunctioning medical implant they are using.

There are a number of medical implant devices that have been recalled from the medical market e.g. rejuvenate recall. These recalls are mainly aimed to help patients; however, most of them come a little too late. The most common medical implant device that has gotten most complaints is metal on metal hip implant. The most recent hip implant device to be recalled is Rejuvenate. Rejuvenate recall comes after several patients installed with the device reported frequent injuries due to the device.

Hip implant and common complaints

Hip implant surgery is a common medical procedure. It is carried out by an orthopedic surgeon. The hip implant devices are used to replace either broken or damaged hip sockets. The device usually has 3 components that allow patients to move their hips normally.

1. Femoral Stem: This piece is placed on the thigh bone

2. Femoral Head: This component is attached to femoral stem

3. The Acetebulum: Where a femoral head is found.

Hip surgery has a high success rate. Under normal condition, the implanted device can last for at least ten years to over thirty years. Keeping in mind that all medical devices eventually come to an end; thus, they may require future replacement. It is very sad, that there are patients who report injuries, defects or malfunction within the first 2 years after their hip surgery. The Stryker Orthopedics reviewed the rejuvenate hip replacement and found that it among the defective implants, they later recalled it. Due to the high number of complaints, several devices have been recalled e.g. rejuvenate recall. These are some of the symptoms of a failed hip implant device:

1. Dislocation of the implant making it useless for patients·

2. Small pieces of its metal are into the bloodstream. These pieces can be toxic; thus, they can lead to life threatening tissue reactions.

3. Bone breaking

Seeking Help due to defect rejuvenate hip implant

Those who are suffering due to a defective medical hip implant, the best thing to do is to seek legal advice from an injury lawyer. Due to rejuvenate recall lawsuits are mounting against Stryker and Depuy. Look for an attorney who specializes in defective devices so that you can get a proper representation in the court. They will help you get the compensation you really deserve. The following are some of the variables considered by an attorney when determining the worth of metal hip replacement law suit:

1. The pain or suffering that is inflicted upon the patient

2. How old is the patient and his or her general health

3. The amount of toxins that have entered into the bloodstream of the patient.

4. Wages lost due to the hip replacement pain.

Rejuvenate recall is sole responsibility of Stryker Orthopedics, who evaluated the intent of injuries caused by the devices and withdrew it from the market. This is a positive move towards ensuring production of safe and quality metal hip replacement devices and anyone who has been affected is advised to file his or her law suit.

Pinnacle Recall

Pinnacle Recall – Failing to Meet the Highest Criteria of Sturdiness and Functionality

Speculations have started mounting about a potential recall of the DePuy Pinnacle hip replacements based on metal-to-metal. Law suits and claim investigations are now gaining preparation momentum as legal companies and prospective attorneys prepare to award Pinnacle recipients their due justice.

The acetabular component by pinnacle has of late faced increased scrutiny due to not only its premature failures, but also its ability to suit clients and patients as stipulated. Therefore, DePuy is facing a recall of this hip replacement component at a cost. According to many sources, the company has of late enjoyed a large base of patients driven by hip and related concerns but still need the best solutions in the shortest time possible. This has in turn sparkled innovations by the firm making it to enjoy more than 200 products within a short time. However according to the sources, the company is potentially at risk of losing billions of dollars to the same patients they reap from due to an inefficient replacement system.

Two systems, the hip replacement and resurfacing equipment were initially meant and supposed to completely eliminate the problem of device failures due to overuse but they haven’t lived to this promise. The metal-on-metal construction system feature was supposed to address failure rates but studies have shown a different plane whereby the construction creates other more serious and adverse effects. And with the very many complications, attorneys and law firms have begun their long journey of investigation and trying to find out how they can present the case in a court of law as patients and Pinnacle recipients have stood great physical and health risk despite their current unstable forms.

Therefore, the Pinnacle Recall will not only sweep away the systems from the face of medical technology but will also be a warning to future inaccurate and uncompetitive models and innovations whose continued freedom and existence jeopardize people’s lives. Definitely, this has not been good news for Pinnacle, courtesy of Johnson & Johnson, which has enjoyed over 150,000 hip replacements since inception into service early in the year 2001. Nevertheless, sources indicate that the news which caught the company by surprise has been one of the most celebrated piece as the defective ASR metal-on-metal implant system forced many patients to suffer from additionally painful and expensively dehumanising hip revision surgeries.


Pinnacle Recall – Action Measures and Beforehand Precaution

Further, it has been found that much of the problem rotates around the Pinnacle 36m Ultamet metal component which has failed at an unacceptably high rate. According to a theory working towards determining the cause, it states that a design flaw and problem comes from the fact that the device was created from one of the lowest clearance levels in the medical technology industry. This has therefore landed the manufacturer into problem as it’s his responsibility to ensure that such vital and life-implicating devices meet the highest levels of sturdiness and functionality. And as law experts and attorneys are currently investigating the basis of such a high failure in the design of the product, those affected have been advised about releasing any confidential medical information to any DePuy dealer or representative before consulting a hip representative counsel.

ASR Recall

ASR Recall Metal on Metal Hip Recalls

In the ASR recall, ASR XL Acetubular System and ASR Hip Resurfacing System had been recalled by the manufacturers DePuy Orthopaedics and Johnson & Johnson on 8th August 2010, due to mounting evidence that these devices have failure rates that are higher than normal.

The devices in the ASR recall were intended to last up to 15 years and have a 12-13 percent failure rate during the first years of implantation. The failure rate is double that of the industry. Some of the surgeons do believe that ASR hip implant has a mistake in its design that makes it difficult to implant. 93000 units of the DePuy metal on metal hip replacement are believed to be part of the ASR recall.

Metal on metal implants account for around 33 percent of the around 250000 hip replacements that are performed in the US. Patients in the ASR recall are injured by the premature deterioration of the hip replacement. According to an article published in the British Medical Journal the deterioration causes the release of toxic metals (cobalt and chromium) into the blood stream, this will lead to painful tumors and swelling. Some devices fail completely causing the fracture of the bone that is around the implant. The complications of patients in the ASR recall are necrosis, hip failure, osteolysis and metallosis. This also occurs in ASR recall patients.

ASR recall is not the only recall another company Stryker has also recalled Trident PSL and Hemispherical Acetabular Cups, also recalled are the ABG II hip and rejuvenate hip implants this because they also corrode at the modular neck junction releasing toxic chemicals into the bloodstream. Stryker faces multicounty litigation in New Jersey and there are also similar allegations that have been filed in the US district court. In Minnesota there are at least 198 Stryker recall claims that are now pending in the proceeding. Any hip replacement that has experienced complications resulting from the condition described above is eligible to file a lawsuit against Stryker seeking compensation for lost wages, medical bills and the pain and suffering. Pharmaceutical injury attorneys are representing some of the patients who are seeking compensation. Their firms offer free evaluations for patients who have suffered complications resulting from the ABG II and rejuvenate hip implants. Before the Stryker hip recall in July of 2012 around 20000 ABG II and rejuvenate hip implants had already been sold globally.

Smith & Nephew also recalled its R3 Acetabular System hip implants on June of 2012. The patients who have the implants experience the same complications as the other metal hip replacement systems above.

Zimmer has implanted the durum artificial hip in around 12000 patients in the US. The implant causes the same problems as the other metal hip implants described above. Zimmer, unlike other companies, decided to suspend sales in 2008 instead of a hip recall. Zimmer patients represented by Lief Cabraser settled their cases with Zimmer on confidential and favorable terms in 2011 and 2012. On 4th September 2012 an Aekansas man filed a lawsuit against Zimmer in the Arkansas Eastern District court.

Other companies that are facing lawsuits as a result of their metal on metal implants include Biomet for its M2a metal on metal hip devices and Wright Medical for their Technology’s Conserve Plus implants. In February of 2012 federal judges ordered that all the hip lawsuits be consolidated to the United States District Court for the North District of Georgia and they be ruled by a single judge. According to court documents around 650 Biomet hip implants lawsuits are pending in the federal courts.

Stryker Hip Lawsuit

Steps for a Stryker Hip Lawsuit

Before proceeding with the Stryker hip recall lawsuit, you will need to contact one of our product liability lawyers. Our lawyers will serve as your support and defender for the Stryker hip recall from the beginning to the end of the case. With our knowledge and understanding of the laws related to damages resulting from product defects, you can be assured with your key to success. This is why it is important for you to file your Stryker Hip Lawsuit with us to handle your case.

You lawyer will help you proceed to the next step which is to find tangible evidences. Your medical records and the documents during your surgery may be needed to prove that you have undergone hip replacement and the material used was from the company.

Your current medical condition will also be assessed to ascertain that the injuries or diseases you have are related to the use of the defective metal implant. Upon making sure that your current state is a part of Stryker Hip Replacement Side effects / failures, you will now be able to file the case.

Our product liability lawyers and you will be filling out certain forms in a court to file the case. After the case has been filed, you will await for the notice of hearing.

The number of hearings depends on the judgement of the court officials assigned to your case. The final decision will be revealed after all evidences are presented and the processes of hearing and proceedings have been completed.

If you are experiencing Stryker Hip Replacement Side effects or failures, you fill out our free form to begin a Stryker Hip Recall Lawsuit. The company must pay compensation for damages, and you don’t have to live with the side effects all by yourself.

Act now and contact one of our product liability attorneys who specialize in the Stryker hip recall for a free claim evaluation.

DePuy Hip Recall

DePuy Hip: What Are the Dangers? 

Johnson & Johnson/DePuy Orthopaedics’ ASR Hip Resurfacing System andASR XL Acetabular System were recalled by the manufacturers on August 8, 2010, because of mounting evidence that the devices have higher-than-expected early failure rates.

The devices, intended to last around fifteen years, have a 12-13 percent failure rate within the first few years of implantation. This failure rate is roughly double the industry average. Some surgeons believe that the ASR hip implant has a basic design flaw that makes it difficult to implant.

Regardless of exactly why the devices fail, the result has been pain, suffering, and additional surgery for many recipients. The Depuy ASR hip implants are in a class of hip replacement products known as metal-on-metal implants, a technology only about ten years old.

Metal-on-metal implants became popular because they were believed to be superior to earlier implant devices. These units replace the bone “ball-and-socket” found in a natural hip with parts made of metals such as cobalt and chromium.

Metal-on-metal implants account for roughly one third of the 250,000 hip replacements performed in the United States each year. But many orthopedic surgeons are hesitant to continue using them because of the risk of tissue and bone damage they can cause.

Recipients of ASR devices specifically are injured when the hip replacement units begin to deteriorate prematurely. As they do, they can release flecks of toxic metal debris into the recipient’s bloodstream, which may lead to painful swelling and tumors. Some devices even come loose and fail completely. When this happens, the bone around the implant can fracture.

Only by receiving a complete medical diagnosis can you be sure that you are not in danger. This might include returning for an annual evaluation to make sure any ASR device you’ve had implanted continues to function safely. During your initial doctor’s visit, you can expect to have a blood test to measure the level of microscopic metal pieces surrounding your hip. If you have elevated metal particle levels, this could be an indication that your ASR hip is failing.

If your doctor does decide that your ASR replacement hip should be removed and replaced, your next step should be to speak to a DePuy hip recall lawyer. Although Johnson & Johnson has promised to reimburse recipients of ASR devices for all relevant testing and treatment (including, if necessary, a follow-up surgery), the simple fact is that this company has already betrayed your trust once.

If you feel like you have a claim against Johnson & Johnson regarding the DePuy Hip Recall, please fill out the Free Case Review Form on the right and we will have someone contact you within 48 hours.